We reject the contention of defendant that his statement to a police officer was obtained in violation of his right to counsel. Defendant made the statement while he was in custody after arraignment on an unrelated charge, and defendant failed to meet his burden of establishing that an attorney had been assigned on that charge or that he had requested counsel ( see, People v. Rosa, 65 N.Y.2d 380, 387-388; People v. Vasquez, 252 A.D.2d 989, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 907; cf., People v. Burdo, 91 N.Y.2d 146, 149-150). In any event, any error in failing to suppress the admission of defendant that he was present in the house on the night that one of the victims was attacked is harmless ( see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 237; People v. Samuel, 161 A.D.2d 1175, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 864).