From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vargas

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 26, 2017
61 N.Y.S.3d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

10-26-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Emmanuel VARGAS, Defendant–Appellant.

Rosemary Herbert, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Samuel J. Mendez of Counsel), for appellant. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Peter D. Coddington of Counsel), for respondent.


Rosemary Herbert, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Samuel J. Mendez of Counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Peter D. Coddington of Counsel), for respondent.

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

TOM, J.P., MANZANET–DANIELS, MAZZARELLI, OING, and SINGH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Vargas

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 26, 2017
61 N.Y.S.3d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Vargas

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Emmanuel VARGAS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 26, 2017

Citations

61 N.Y.S.3d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)