Opinion
November 2, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hellenbrand, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury concerning the issue of motive is unpreserved for review, as no exception was raised to that portion of the charge (see, CPL 470.05). In any event, viewed in its entirety, the charge adequately conveyed the law to the jury and did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial. Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.