From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Van Etten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 25, 1983
94 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

May 25, 1983

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified, on the law and facts, in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed and defendant remanded to Supreme Court, Erie County, for resentencing. Memorandum: Defendant's conviction of grand larceny in the second degree (Penal Law, § 155.35) cannot be sustained because the People failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the value of stolen jewelry exceeded $1,500. Market value or replacement cost, not original cost of the stolen property, is required to sustain a larceny conviction (Penal Law, § 155.20, subd 1; People v Harold, 22 N.Y.2d 443, 445). Defendant's contention that the trial court failed preliminarily to instruct the jury pursuant to CPL 270.40 was not preserved for review ( People v Robinson, 36 N.Y.2d 224, 228; CPL 470.05, subd 2) and is harmless error. The judgment is modified by reducing defendant's conviction for grand larceny in the second degree to the lesser included crime of petit larceny (Penal Law, § 155.20, subd 4).


Summaries of

People v. Van Etten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 25, 1983
94 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

People v. Van Etten

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES VAN ETTEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 25, 1983

Citations

94 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

People v. Sweeney

In the absence of competent proof of value, the judgment must be modified to reduce the conviction for grand…

People v. Share

In the absence of competent proof of value, the judgment must be modified to reduce each of the two…