From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Valverde

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1995
216 A.D.2d 339 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 5, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.).


Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

The defendant's claim of error as to the admission of certain hearsay testimony by the codefendants' uncle is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Dubois, 137 A.D.2d 706). In any event, any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Pizzuto, J.P., Hart, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Valverde

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1995
216 A.D.2d 339 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Valverde

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALIXCAIR VALVERDE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 339 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 992

Citing Cases

Valverde v. Stinson

On June 5, 1995, the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court unanimously affirmed Valverde's…

People v. Williams

The defendant's contention that the trial court erred in allowing a police officer to testify that he…