From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Valentine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 9, 1995
212 A.D.2d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 9, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Andrias, J.).


Viewed in a light most favorable to the People, the complainant's testimony that she suffered a swollen and sore neck, back and arm after being pushed by defendant during the incident was sufficient to raise a jury question whether the requisite physical injury necessary to support a conviction of robbery in the second degree had been sustained (see, People v Pope, 174 A.D.2d 319, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 1079; People v. Rodney, 134 A.D.2d 463). Nor did defendant's apparent absence from a preliminary discussion of Sandoval issues, which were thereafter resolved after argument in open court in defendant's presence, violate his right to be present at material stages of the trial, since his presence would have been wholly superfluous (see, People v. Favor, 82 N.Y.2d 254).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Valentine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 9, 1995
212 A.D.2d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Valentine

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DERRICK VALENTINE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 9, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
622 N.Y.S.2d 683

Citing Cases

Vasquez v. Ercole

" See, e.g., People v. James, 769 N.Y.S.2d 38, 38 (App.Div. 2003) ("The element of physical injury was…

People v. Tucker

Accordingly, defendant's motion to suppress identification evidence was properly denied. Defendant is not…