From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Valdez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted December 20, 1999

February 24, 2000

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), rendered November 13, 1995, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Paul Liu of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Nicoletta J. Caferri, and Craig Stephen Brown of counsel), for respondent.

THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, HOWARD MILLER and SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends, inter alia, that he was deprived of a fair trial because of prosecutorial misconduct. We agree that several remarks made by the prosecutor, both during cross-examination and in summation, exceeded the bounds of proper advocacy. However, the comments were harmless error because the evidence of guilt was overwhelming and the comments did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230 ; People v. Valdez, 262 A.D.2d 338; [2d Dept., June 1, 199]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Valdez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Valdez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. LUIS VALDEZ, appellant. (Ind. No. 4797/94)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 727

Citing Cases

People v. O'Henry

05; People v. Medina, 53 NY2d 951, 953; People v. Clemmings, 300 AD2d 672; People v. McHarris, 297 AD2d 824,…

People v. Foxworth

05; People v. Hunte, 276 A.D.2d 717). In any event, while we agree that certain questioning was improper (see…