From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Usher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 26, 1981
80 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

February 26, 1981

Appeal from the Monroe County Court.

Present — Cardamone, J.P., Simons, Callahan, Doerr and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment insofar as it resentenced defendant upon a finding of violation of probation unanimously vacated and defendant restored to probation. Memorandum: The People's evidence failed to establish what defendant's reporting obligation was, that he was aware of it or that he had violated it. The only material evidence offered was the affidavit of defendant's probation officer. While the affidavit was admissible under the broad rules governing violation hearings, it did not qualify as competent evidence under the business record exception to the hearsay rule. That being so, there was no residuum of competent legal evidence in the record to support the court's determination that defendant had violated probation (see People ex rel. Wallace v. State of New York, 70 A.D.2d 781; People v. Lynch, 31 A.D.2d 753).


Summaries of

People v. Usher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 26, 1981
80 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

People v. Usher

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL USHER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 26, 1981

Citations

80 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

People v. Todd

e law and the facts, defendant is restored to probation, and matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau…

People v. Raleigh

No proof of the first three violations was offered by the People at the hearing. On this appeal defendant…