From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Urrego

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 21, 2016
145 A.D.3d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

12-21-2016

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Gilberto URREGO, appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Arthur H. Hopkirk of counsel), for appellant. Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Alexander Fumelli of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Arthur H. Hopkirk of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Alexander Fumelli of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), dated January 23, 2015, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In this proceeding under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law § 168 et seq. ), insofar as relevant to this appeal, the Supreme Court assessed the defendant 30 points under risk factor 3 (“Number of Victims”). In determining that the defendant had three victims, the court relied on the defendant's plea of guilty as to one victim and grand jury testimony from two additional victims. We find no basis to overturn the court's determination that the grand jury testimony admitted in this case constituted clear and convincing evidence supporting the assessment of 30 points under risk factor 3 (see People v. Carleo, 82 A.D.3d 1067, 1068, 918 N.Y.S.2d 795 ; cf. People v. Tubbs, 124 A.D.3d 1094, 1094, 1 N.Y.S.3d 561 ; see generally People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 572, 883 N.Y.S.2d 154, 910 N.E.2d 983 ; People v. Wells, 138 A.D.3d 947, 950, 30 N.Y.S.3d 198 ). Accordingly, the court properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender.

BALKIN, J.P., DICKERSON, LaSALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Urrego

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 21, 2016
145 A.D.3d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Urrego

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Gilberto URREGO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 21, 2016

Citations

145 A.D.3d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
42 N.Y.S.3d 841
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8552

Citing Cases

People v. Morrison

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court improperly assessed 30 points under risk factor 3 for the…

People v. Morrison

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court improperly assessed 30 points under risk factor 3 for the…