From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tyson

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 26, 2019
935 N.W.2d 322 (Mich. 2019)

Opinion

SC: 158225 COA: 338299

11-26-2019

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank Earl TYSON, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the Court of Appeals judgment declining to consider the defendant’s challenge to the proportionality of his departure sentence. Under People v. Steanhouse , 500 Mich. 453, 476, 902 N.W.2d 327 (2017), that court must review the departure sentence for an abuse of discretion, i.e., engage in a reasonableness review for an abuse of discretion informed by the "principle of proportionality." We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for plenary review of the defendant’s claim that his sentence was not reasonable and proportionate.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Tyson

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 26, 2019
935 N.W.2d 322 (Mich. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Tyson

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FRANK EARL TYSON…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Nov 26, 2019

Citations

935 N.W.2d 322 (Mich. 2019)

Citing Cases

Tyson v. Vashaw

Petitioner then filed another application for leave to appeal with the Michigan Supreme Court, which remanded…

People v. Tyson

Our Supreme Court concluded, "[u]nder People v Steanhouse, 500 Mich 453, 476 (2017), that court must review…