From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tyes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 9, 2004
9 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

KA 02-01575.

July 9, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), rendered July 1, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree.

Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20). Contrary to the contention of defendant, his unrestricted waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his present contention regarding the severity of the sentence ( see People v. Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). In any event, the bargained-for sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Contrary to defendant's further contention, the record does not establish that Supreme Court was unaware that it had the ability to exercise its discretion in determining whether to impose a lesser period of postrelease supervision ( cf. People v. Stanley, 309 AD2d 1254).


Summaries of

People v. Tyes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 9, 2004
9 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Tyes

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD TYES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 9, 2004

Citations

9 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
779 N.Y.S.2d 388

Citing Cases

People v. Oliveras-Arvelo

Defendant's further contention that Supreme Court erred in failing to apprehend the extent of its discretion…

People v. Montgomery

The issue whether defense counsel made the alleged statement presented a credibility issue that the court was…