From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tuscillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 14, 1930
229 App. Div. 240 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

March 14, 1930.

Appeal from County Court of the County of Richmond.

Alfred V. Norton, for the appellant.

Lester L. Callan, Assistant District Attorney [ Albert C. Fach, District Attorney, with him on the brief], for the respondent.

Present — LAZANSKY, P.J., YOUNG, CARSWELL, SCUDDER and TOMPKINS, JJ.


In light of the testimony of witnesses that defendant had stated that he had authorized his brother to bribe the complaining witness in order to keep the latter away from the trial, the testimony of the complaining witness that a person, who stated that he was a brother of defendant, had paid him $250 to keep away from the trial was properly admissible. ( Adams v. People, 9 Hun, 89.)

On reargument, the judgment of conviction of the County Court of Richmond county should be affirmed.


On reargument, judgment of conviction of the County Court of Richmond county unanimously affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Tuscillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 14, 1930
229 App. Div. 240 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

People v. Tuscillo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RALPH TUSCILLO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1930

Citations

229 App. Div. 240 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
240 N.Y.S. 588

Citing Cases

People v. Springer

The arsonist gained access to the house through an ordinarily locked back door without having to force…