From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tusa

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 24, 2016
142 A.D.3d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

08-24-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Joseph TUSA, appellant.

Laurette Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.


Laurette Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), imposed April 3, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Green, 136 A.D.3d 1055, 1055, 25 N.Y.S.3d 608 ).

ENG, P.J., BALKIN, HALL, COHEN and MALTESE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tusa

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 24, 2016
142 A.D.3d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Tusa

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Joseph TUSA, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 24, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5881
36 N.Y.S.3d 829

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate…

People v. Smith

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes…