From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Turner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1974
45 A.D.2d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

June 17, 1974


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 25, 1972, convicting him of criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to one year in the New York City Correctional Institution. The appeal also brings up for review an order of the same court, dated October 3, 1972, which denied a motion to suppress physical evidence, after a hearing. Judgment and order reversed, on the law and the facts, motion to suppress evidence granted, and indictment dismissed. We are of the opinion that there was no probable cause for defendant's arrest. Therefore, the subsequent warrantless search was invalid and any property seized as a result thereof should have been suppressed. If we were not dismissing the indictment, we would order a new trial because of the prejudicial conduct by the prosecuting attorney when he stipulated with the attorneys for codefendants Jones and Stewart that, in return for their pleas of guilty, they would not testify at the trial of defendants Turner or Bolds, either on behalf of the People or on behalf of defendants Turner or Bolds. This deprived defendants Turner and Bolds of testimony by the codefendants which might have been exculpatory. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Christ, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Turner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1974
45 A.D.2d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

People v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROGER TURNER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1974

Citations

45 A.D.2d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

People v. Dixon

ceedings, defendant admitted his guilt and made no statements asserting his innocence ( compare People v.…

State v. Sharpe

Citing those inconsistencies, the court denied defendant's second motion because the new evidence would…