From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Turman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1991
172 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 8, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fisher, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends on appeal that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to establish that the complainant sustained a physical injury within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (9). Since the defendant did not make his motion to dismiss at trial on the specific ground that there was insufficient evidence to prove physical injury, the defendant's claim is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Osuna, 65 N.Y.2d 822, 824; People v. Cona, 49 N.Y.2d 26, 33, n 2). In any event, the claim is without merit (see, People v. Bogan, 70 N.Y.2d 860).

Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contention and find that it is without merit (see, People v. Nimmons, 72 N.Y.2d 830; People v. Lugo, 150 A.D.2d 502). Brown, J.P., Kooper, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Turman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1991
172 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Turman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TIMOTHY TURMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The defendant's contention that the evidence of physical injury was legally insufficient to support the…