From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tunstall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1989
149 A.D.2d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

April 3, 1989

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tunstall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1989
149 A.D.2d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Tunstall

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TONY TUNSTALL, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1989

Citations

149 A.D.2d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)