From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1985
111 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Summary

In Gutierrez v. Trillium, 111 A.D.2d 669, 671, the court stated that vehicle stops which are foreseeable under the prevailing traffic conditions, even if sudden and frequent, must be anticipated by the driver who follows, since he or she is under a duty to maintain a safe distance.

Summary of this case from Roman v. Sullivan Paramedicine, Inc.

Opinion

June 18, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Goldfluss, J.).


Since, as the People forthrightly concede, defendant committed the second of his violent felony offenses prior to the April 1, 1976 sentence imposed on his first violent felony offense conviction, he could not, under the holding of People v. Morse ( 62 N.Y.2d 205), be adjudicated a persistent violent felony offender, at least on the basis of those two convictions. Accordingly, we vacate said finding and the sentence based thereon and remand for resentence.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Asch, Bloom and Rosenberger, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1985
111 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

In Gutierrez v. Trillium, 111 A.D.2d 669, 671, the court stated that vehicle stops which are foreseeable under the prevailing traffic conditions, even if sudden and frequent, must be anticipated by the driver who follows, since he or she is under a duty to maintain a safe distance.

Summary of this case from Roman v. Sullivan Paramedicine, Inc.
Case details for

People v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT TUCKER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Roman v. Sullivan Paramedicine, Inc.

Cases in which a plaintiff accused of short stopping was not held to be comparatively negligent, or in which…