From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1995
216 A.D.2d 339 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 5, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that the Assistant District Attorney's summation constituted reversible error. In any event, none of the alleged errors would warrant reversal of the judgment in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v. Pilgrim, 208 A.D.2d 868).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05), without merit, or constitute harmless error. Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, O'Brien and Thompson, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1995
216 A.D.2d 339 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD TUCKER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 339 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 991