Opinion
June 5, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that the Assistant District Attorney's summation constituted reversible error. In any event, none of the alleged errors would warrant reversal of the judgment in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v. Pilgrim, 208 A.D.2d 868).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05), without merit, or constitute harmless error. Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, O'Brien and Thompson, JJ., concur.