From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1987
130 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

May 11, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant, having observed a larceny while it was in progress and having assisted the perpetrator to complete that larceny, is liable as an accomplice to the larceny (see, People v. Robinson, 60 N.Y.2d 982, 984). Moreover, the jury could reasonably have inferred from the defendant's act of raising a nightstick in a threatening manner, after the principal took the property from the victim, that the defendant possessed the requisite mental culpability for the crime charged (see, People v. Barnes, 50 N.Y.2d 375, 381; People v. Bracey, 41 N.Y.2d 296, 301; Penal Law § 20.00).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for review (see, People v. Whalen, 59 N.Y.2d 273, 279-280; People v. Thomas, 50 N.Y.2d 467), and is, in any case, without merit (see, People v Barnes, supra, at 380). Lawrence, J.P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1987
130 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EARL TUCKER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 11, 1987

Citations

130 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Mejia

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we…

People v. Farmer

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Steuben County Court…