From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Trinci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 14, 1959
7 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Opinion

January 14, 1959

Appeal from the Erie County Court.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Williams, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.


Judgment of conviction reversed on the law and facts as to count one of the indictment and count one dismissed, and otherwise judgment of conviction affirmed. Memorandum: The judgment of conviction as to the first count of the indictment should be reversed and the count dismissed on the ground that the quality of proof was not sufficient to establish the guilt of the defendant as to that count beyond a reasonable doubt. Subdivision 2 of section 2460 of the Penal Law is aimed at commercialized rather than individual or isolated acts of prostitution. ( People v. Jelke, 1 N.Y.2d 321, 327; People v. Draper, 169 App. Div. 479, 484.) There is sufficient proof to support the judgment of conviction as to the other counts which, accordingly, should be sustained. Since the prisoner was sentenced solely on the first count and sentences were suspended on the other counts, further proceedings should be had with respect to the prisoner's sentence. (See People ex rel. Maurer v. Jackson, 2 N.Y.2d 259, 267.) All concur, except Williams, J., who dissents in part and votes to reverse as to count two and to dismiss that count, and otherwise concurs.


Summaries of

People v. Trinci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 14, 1959
7 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)
Case details for

People v. Trinci

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GINO TRINCI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1959

Citations

7 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Citing Cases

State v. Linder

This is a case of first impression in our state and as a result thereof, there is no Missouri precedent to…

People v. King

When a criminal action is being considered in the normal appellate process, we apply the law applicable at…