From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Trejo

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Feb 23, 2012
B230171 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 23, 2012)

Opinion

B230171

02-23-2012

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PEDRO GABRIEL TREJO et al., Defendants and Appellants.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VA103146)


ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on February 7, 2012, be modified as follows:

On page 12, Part II, the second sentence, third line, the word "authorized" should be changed to "unauthorized" so the sentence now reads: Appellants contend the restitution order constitutes an unauthorized sentence, reasoning that because they were acquitted of murder and convicted only of conspiracy to commit murder they did not cause the victim's family to suffer any economic loss.

There is no change in the judgment.

_____________________

BOREN, P. J.,

_____________________

DOI TODD, J.,

_____________________

CHAVEZ, J.


Summaries of

People v. Trejo

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Feb 23, 2012
B230171 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 23, 2012)
Case details for

People v. Trejo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PEDRO GABRIEL TREJO et al.…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

Date published: Feb 23, 2012

Citations

B230171 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 23, 2012)