"A trial court's decision regarding substitution of counsel will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion." People v Traylor, 245 Mich.App. 460, 462; 628 N.W.2d 120 (2001). A trial court's ruling on a defendant's request for an adjournment or continuance is also reviewed for an abuse of discretion.

"A trial court's decision regarding substitution of counsel will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion." People v Traylor, 245 Mich App 460, 462; 628 NW2d 120 (2001). "A trial court abuses its discretion when its decision falls outside the range of reasonable and principled outcomes."

"An indigent defendant is guaranteed the right to counsel; however, he is not entitled to have the attorney of his choice appointed simply by requesting that the attorney originally appointed be replaced." People v Traylor, 245 Mich App 460, 462; 628 NW2d 120 (2001) (citation omitted). "Appointment of a substitute counsel is warranted only upon a showing of good cause and where substitution will not unreasonably disrupt the judicial process."

Therefore, because defendant argues that he did not actually deliver or manufacture methamphetamine, and does not actually argue that there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, we consider this issue abandoned. People v Traylor, 245 Mich App 460, 464; 628 NW2d 120 (2001), quoting People v Norman, 184 Mich App 255, 260; 457 NW2d 136 (1990) (" 'Defendant may not leave it to this Court to search for a factual basis to sustain or reject his position.' "). We note that there was sufficient evidence to convict defendant of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine.

Further, there is no indication in the record that African-Americans were underrepresented in his jury venire, and we will not search for a factual basis to sustain or reject Nenrod's position. People v Traylor, 245 Mich App 460, 464; 628 NW2d 120 (2001). Consequently, Nenrod has failed to establish a prima facie violation of the fair cross-section requirement.

" As this Court has explained: People v Traylor, 245 Mich App 460, 462; 628 NW2d 120 (2001).People v Yost, 278 Mich App 341, 379; 749 NW2d 753 (2008).

As this Court has explained: People v. Traylor, 245 Mich.App. 460, 462, 628 N.W.2d 120 (2001). People v. Yost, 278 Mich.App. 341, 379, 749 N.W.2d 753 (2008).

“A trial court's decision regarding substitution of counsel will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.” People v. Traylor, 245 Mich.App. 460, 462; 628 N.W.2d 120 (2001). An abuse of discretion occurs “when the court chooses an outcome that falls outside the range of principled outcomes.”

" People v Traylor, 245 Mich.App. 460, 462; 628 N.W.2d 120 (2001) (citation omitted). Good cause does not exist when the attorney fails to file futile motions.

"A trial court's decision regarding substitution of counsel will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion." People v Traylor, 245 Mich App 460, 462; 628 NW2d 120 (2001). An abuse of discretion occurs "when the court chooses an outcome that falls outside the range of principled outcomes."