From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1995
213 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 20, 1995

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.).


Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the term of imprisonment that was imposed upon his resentencing violated due process because, inter alia, it exceeds the maximum sentence the court had originally indicated it might impose is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. In addition, the defendant's sentence is not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is unsupported by the record. Mangano, P.J., O'Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1995
213 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Travis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VICTOR TRAVIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 20, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 917

Citing Cases

People v. Corker

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed. The defendant's contentions that resentencing him approximately 7…