From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Toscano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 31, 1989
154 A.D.2d 314 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

October 31, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County, Joseph Mazur, J.


Admission of the police officer's redirect testimony of hearsay statements made by the crime victims, one of whom did not testify, did not constitute error, since defendant "opened the door" to the line of questioning pursued by the prosecutor. (People v Melendez, 55 N.Y.2d 445.) The complained-of summation remarks made by the prosecutor were merely a fair response to defense counsel's summation challenging the credibility of the People's witnesses. (People v Morgan, 66 N.Y.2d 255.) Defendant's remaining argument has been considered and deemed meritless.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Toscano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 31, 1989
154 A.D.2d 314 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Toscano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICARDO TOSCANO, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1989

Citations

154 A.D.2d 314 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
546 N.Y.S.2d 603

Citing Cases

People v. Gonzalez

However, he went on to say, he would increase the sentence in exchange for the prosecution's promise not to…

People v. Carll

Defendant has failed to preserve his bolstering claim for appellate review as a matter of law by appropriate…