From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Torres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 2, 1998
249 A.D.2d 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 2, 1998

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.).


Since evidence of possession of a weapon was material, admissible proof with respect to defendant's other crimes, the weapon count was properly joined pursuant to CPL 200.20 (2) (b). In order to establish defendant's criminal involvement in two separate robberies, the People were entitled to establish that a criminal partnership existed among defendant and his two codefendants. Evidence that defendant knew one of the codefendants and passed him a gun, recovered by the police, which fit the description given by a witness of a gun that defendant had used, just days before, to commit a robbery with that codefendant (see, People v. Del Vermo, 192 N.Y. 470, 478-481), was highly relevant to the question of whether he had acted in concert in that robbery. Likewise, evidence of the criminal relationship between defendant and this codefendant was relevant in tying defendant to the second robbery where the only physical evidence recovered was found in this codefendant's apartment. Additionally, it was admissible to establish the veracity of defendant's detailed confessions linking him and both of his codefendants to the crimes.

We reject defendant's claim that he was entitled to dismissal of the indictment, rather than severance, on the ground of misjoinder of defendants. By granting severance, the court cured any misjoinder of defendants, and any prejudice to defendant was obviated.

While it is clear that defendant had a right to be present during a sidebar conference at which the four alternate jurors were selected (People v. Antommarchi, 80 N.Y.2d 247, 250), defendant can show no prejudice since none of these individuals ever deliberated (People v. Moe, 227 A.D.2d 253, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 968).

Finally, defendant's claim with respect to the court's supplemental instruction is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find it to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Rubin and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Torres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 2, 1998
249 A.D.2d 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE TORRES, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 2, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 43

Citing Cases

People v. Whitley

As the court thoroughly instructed the jury, this evidence was not admitted to show defendant's general…

People v. Ruiz

In that regard, "evidence of ‘a distinctive repetitive pattern’ of criminal conduct may be admitted [as part…