Opinion
December 29, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court properly denied the defendant's request to charge petit larceny as a lesser-included offense of robbery in the second degree since no reasonable view of the evidence would have supported the conclusion that the defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater offense ( see, People v. White, 121 A.D.2d 762; People v. France, 216 A.D.2d 579).
The sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.