Opinion
June 22, 2000.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obus, J.), rendered September 8, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 5 years probation, unanimously affirmed.
Theresa A. Foudy, for respondent.
Richard Joselson, for defendant-appellant.
Before: Williams, J.P., Tom, Ellerin, Andrias, Saxe, JJ.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. A police officer, posing as defendant's friend and coworker, telephoned defendant's girlfriend and told her that defendant had been arrested and that defendant wanted her to bring his pistol to the purported friend, citing safety concerns. The record establishes that no express or implied threats of any kind were made. The girlfriend located the pistol in the apartment she shared with defendant and turned it over to the purported friend at a prearranged meeting place. We find that the police action was not a search of defendant's apartment, but was instead analogous to an undercover operation, which does not implicate Fourth Amendment rights (Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293; Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206). We would also conclude that deceiving a person into bringing contraband to a place where it can be lawfully seized without a warrant is analogous to luring a person to a place where he can be arrested without a warrant, and such a ruse is permissible when it is not so fundamentally unfair as to undermine voluntariness (see, People v. Coppin, 202 A.D.2d 279, 280, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 966; People v. Paltoo, 186 A.D.2d 452, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 765;People v. Roe, 136 A.D.2d 140, affd 73 N.Y.2d 1004). Even if the police actions were to be viewed as a search of the apartment, it would be a valid search on consent of one of the occupants notwithstanding the use of a ruse (see, People v. Watson, 259 A.D.2d 380,lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 1029; People v. Roberson, 249 A.D.2d 148, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 904; People v. Entzminger, 163 A.D.2d 138, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 939).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.