From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Torres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 2009
60 A.D.3d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 207.

March 31, 2009.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered April 26, 2006, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (11 counts), and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 21/2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Sheila L. Bautista of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Sweeny, Catterson and Renwick, JJ.


The court properly exercised its discretion when it denied defendant's eve-of-trial request for an adjournment to obtain new retained counsel, since defendant did not establish compelling circumstances, or any legitimate basis for the substitution (see People v Arroyave, 49 NY2d 264, 271). There is nothing to indicate that his attorney's difficulties in collecting her full fee from defendant created an adversarial relationship or affected her representation of defendant (see People v Husbands, 303 AD2d 227, lv denied 100 NY2d 562). Furthermore, although the proposed substitute attorney had contacted the court shortly before trial and had been advised by the court to appear on the trial date ready to proceed, he never appeared.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.


Summaries of

People v. Torres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 2009
60 A.D.3d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PHILLIP TORRES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 31, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2460
877 N.Y.S.2d 243

Citing Cases

People v. Griffin

Consequently, once an attorney-client relationship has been formed between assigned counsel and an indigent…