From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Torres

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 18, 2018
157 A.D.3d 1126 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

107799

01-18-2018

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luis TORRES, Appellant.

George P. Ferro, Albany, for appellant. James R. Farrell, District Attorney, Monticello (Meagan K. Galligan of counsel), for respondent.


George P. Ferro, Albany, for appellant.

James R. Farrell, District Attorney, Monticello (Meagan K. Galligan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Clark and Rumsey, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDERAppeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered July 17, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. Under the terms of the plea agreement, he was to be sentenced as a second violent felony offender to anywhere from seven to 11 years in prison, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Prior to sentencing, defendant absconded to Florida and a warrant was issued for his arrest. When he was returned to New York, County Court sentenced him to 8½ years in prison and five years of postrelease supervision. He now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Upon reviewing the record, however, we find that there is an issue of arguable merit pertaining to the validity of the waiver of the right to appeal that may impact other issues, such as the severity of the sentence (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006] ; see also People v. Kruppenbacher, 154 A.D.3d 1059, 1060, 61 N.Y.S.3d 923 [2017] ). Therefore, without deciding the ultimate merits of this issue, we grant counsel's application for leave to withdraw and assign new counsel to address this issue and any others that the record may disclose (see People v. Stokes, 95 N.Y.2d 633, 722 N.Y.S.2d 217, 744 N.E.2d 1153 [2001] ; People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, 980, 493 N.Y.S.2d 653 [1985], lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 650, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1046, 490 N.E.2d 562 [1986] ).

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.

Garry, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Clark and Rumsey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Torres

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 18, 2018
157 A.D.3d 1126 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luis TORRES, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 18, 2018

Citations

157 A.D.3d 1126 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
66 N.Y.S.3d 925
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 355

Citing Cases

People v. Winters

Upon reviewing the record, we disagree. We find that there is at least one issue of arguable merit with…

People v. Tietje

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there…