From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Torres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 24, 1991
169 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

January 24, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Edwin Torres, J., Ira Beal, J.


The prompt on-the-scene showup was not unduly suggestive. (People v Adams, 53 N.Y.2d 241.) Nor are we persuaded that the showup identification was somehow rendered improper because the police had probable cause to arrest defendant without the identification, based on the observations of a police officer.

As the evidence produced at the hearing did not raise a substantial issue that could not be resolved without resort to the complainant's testimony or addressed on cross-examination at the trial, the hearing court was not required to permit defendant to call the complainant at the hearing. (People v Chipp, 75 N.Y.2d 327, cert denied ___ US ___, 112 L Ed 2d 70.)

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ross and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Torres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 24, 1991
169 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT TORRES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1991

Citations

169 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
564 N.Y.S.2d 741

Citing Cases

People v. Lombardo

Two prosecution witnesses testified that defendant had blond hair when the crimes were committed and that the…

People v. Jones

The victim's description was sufficiently specific, given that defendant and his companion were leaving the…