From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Toney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 10, 1987
132 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

July 10, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Dugan, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Denman, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that the evidence at trial was legally sufficient to support defendant's conviction of manslaughter in the second degree.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence shows that in the early morning hours of April 29, 1983, defendant argued with the victim, engaged in a pushing contest with him and chased him into a playground, where they scuffled. As a third party approached the pair to intervene, defendant ran past him and the victim took two steps before collapsing with blood pouring from his chest. An autopsy revealed that the victim died from massive blood loss as a result of a one-inch stab wound to the left side of his chest. Defendant on that same day left New York for South Carolina. The verdict must be upheld as there is a valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could lead a rational person to the conclusion reached by the jury that the People had satisfactorily met their burden of proof as to defendant's guilt (see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). Defendant further contends that he was deprived of a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct during summation. Having reviewed the prosecutor's conduct we cannot say defendant was deprived of a fair trial (People v. Roopchand, 107 A.D.2d 35, 36, affd 65 N.Y.2d 837).

Defendant in his pro se brief also asserts that the trial court erred in permitting the People to impeach their witness by her prior Grand Jury testimony for failure to recall the events in question (CPL 60.35; People v. Fitzpatrick, 40 N.Y.2d 44). While this impeachment was improper no objection was made by defense counsel, so the error is not preserved for our review. (CPL 470.05; People v. Boyd, 58 N.Y.2d 1016, 1018). We decline to exercise our discretion in the interests of justice.

We have reviewed the remaining contentions raised by defendant pro se and by appellate counsel, and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Toney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 10, 1987
132 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Toney

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EARL TONEY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 10, 1987

Citations

132 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Hickman

This was error. The failure of the witnesses to recall the events in question does not constitute affirmative…

People v. Brazzeal

"No further questions." In view of this failure by the defendant to object to the impeachment of the People's…