From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tomlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1999
265 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued June 9, 1999

October 4, 1999

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.).


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his pre-Miranda statement should have been suppressed is without merit. The defendant's statement that he hit his girlfriend was a spontaneous statement and, therefore, admissible (see, People v. Lynes, 49 N.Y.2d 286, 294; People v. Harrison, 251 A.D.2d 681).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

O'BRIEN, J.P., SULLIVAN, JOY, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tomlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1999
265 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Tomlin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ANTHONY TOMLIN, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 4, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 471

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion…

People v. Patterson

The hearing court properly determined that the defendant's inculpatory statement was admissible. The record…