From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tolbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 22, 1991
169 A.D.2d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

January 22, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The charges against the defendant arose from a complaint by the defendant's 82-year-old employer, that the defendant had stolen a blank check from the complainant, made the check payable to the defendant in the sum of $10,000, and forged the complainant's signature on the check.

Because the complainant died prior to trial, the People, pursuant to CPL 670.10, were allowed to read into the trial record the complainant's testimony given at a felony hearing at which she stated that it was not her signature on the subject check.

The defendant, in attempting to establish that the complainant had voluntarily given her the money, sought to introduce testimony that the complainant's husband had a reputation in the community of being untrustworthy. The defendant also sought to introduce testimony as to the complainant's demeanor on one occasion seven months after the felony hearing. The defendant argues that the trial court erred in excluding this testimony. We agree, however, with the trial court rulings that this evidence was too remote and not probative of any issues in the case (see, People v Pike, 131 A.D.2d 890, 891).

Moreover, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by denying the defendant an adjournment to obtain testimony of her expert witness. By the defendant's own acknowledgement, that expert would testify that based on the evidence he had reviewed, it was his opinion that no determination could be made as to whether the controverted signature was or was not the complainant's. The defendant thus failed to show that the proof would be material and favorable to the defense (see, Matter of Anthony M., 63 N.Y.2d 270, 283-284; People v Whitehead, 155 A.D.2d 567).

The sentence imposed by the court was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit. Brown, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tolbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 22, 1991
169 A.D.2d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Tolbert

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SHAWN TOLBERT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 22, 1991

Citations

169 A.D.2d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
565 N.Y.S.2d 162