From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Timothy Jackson

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 3, 1968
162 N.W.2d 114 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

Docket Nos. 3,411, 3,412.

Decided June 3, 1968.

Appeal from Macomb; Spier (James E.), J. Submitted Division 2 May 15, 1968, at Detroit. (Docket Nos. 3,411, 3,412.) Decided June 3, 1968.

Timothy Jackson and Andrew Tillman were convicted of robbery armed. Defendants appeal. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, George N. Parris, Prosecuting Attorney, and Max D. McCulloch, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Norman L. Zemke, for defendants on appeal.


An armed robbery of a gasoline station attendant took place at about 3:30 a.m. at 12 Mile road and Van Dyke in the city of Warren on September 6, 1966. A few minutes thereafter a car carrying 3 persons, 2 of which satisfied the description of the perpetrators of the armed robbery, was stopped by the police at Dodge and Van Dyke, one block south of 9 Mile road.

CLS 1961, § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 28.797).

Defendants raised 3 issues on appeal from their conviction of robbery armed:

(1) Was there probable cause for their arrest?

(2) Was the search and seizure of their automobile while defendants were in custody proper?

(3) Was evidence surrendered by one of the defendants while in custody pursuant to an officer's request to empty his pockets admissible in evidence?

The record discloses that the two men picked up in the automobile and arrested closely resembled the description given to the police of the two men who perpetrated the armed robbery. The fruits of the search of the automobile after arrest while defendants were in custody were not introduced into evidence. The lighter given up by one of the defendants to one of the police officers when requested to empty his pockets was introduced into evidence and was connected to the crime as being owned by the victim of the armed robbery. It was the subject of a proper search.

We find that the arrest was proper and legal. We find no prejudicial error. Affirmed.

T.G. KAVANAGH, P.J., and HOLBROOK and BEER, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Timothy Jackson

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 3, 1968
162 N.W.2d 114 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

People v. Timothy Jackson

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. TIMOTHY JACKSON. PEOPLE v. TILLMAN

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 3, 1968

Citations

162 N.W.2d 114 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)
162 N.W.2d 114

Citing Cases

People v. Horton

Information supplied from a reliable citizen source is enough to found a reasonable belief, People v Herrera,…

Head v. Hood

All this, of course, is based upon the assumption that the office in question is one to which the complaining…