From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Timko

Court of Appeals of New York
Oct 7, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 5391 (N.Y. 2021)

Opinion

83 SSM 19

10-07-2021

The People & c., Respondent, v. Thomas Timko, Appellant.

Submitted by Michael S. Pollok, for appellant. Submitted by Brian R. Pouliot, for respondent.


No. 83 SSM 19

Submitted by Michael S. Pollok, for appellant.

Submitted by Brian R. Pouliot, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM

The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and the accusatory instrument dismissed.

As the People concede, the accusatory instrument was legally insufficient. The allegations in the factual part of the instrument and in the supporting depositions did not provide reasonable cause to believe that defendant communicated "a threat to cause physical harm to, or unlawful harm to the property of, [the complainant], or a member of such person's same family or household" (Penal Law § 240.30 [1] [a], as amended by L 2014, ch 188, § 1; see generally People v Golb, 23 N.Y.3d 455, 466-468 [2014]).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed and accusatory instrument dismissed, in a memorandum.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson, Singas and Cannataro concur.


Summaries of

People v. Timko

Court of Appeals of New York
Oct 7, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 5391 (N.Y. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Timko

Case Details

Full title:The People & c., Respondent, v. Thomas Timko, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Oct 7, 2021

Citations

2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 5391 (N.Y. 2021)