From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thorpe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1997
245 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 15, 1997

Appeal from the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of assault in the third degree under the ninth count of the indictment, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

On March 10, 1995, the defendant, who had waited for the complainant in the hallway by her apartment, threw the complainant against the wall and punched her in the head. After the incident, the complainant went to the hospital complaining of a severe headache. Fourteen days later, the defendant went to the complainant's apartment, kicked down the door and repeatedly beat and threatened the complainant until she finally escaped through the window. This subsequent assault required the complainant to be hospitalized for five days.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of burglary in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt ( see, People v. Cowan, 184 A.D.2d 778). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

However, we agree with the defendant's contention that the People failed to present any evidence as to physical impairment or pain or the extent of pain suffered to establish "physical injury" (Penal Law § 10.00; § 120.00) for the incident occurring on March 10, 1995 ( see, Matter of Philip A., 49 N.Y.2d 198, 200; People v. Briggs, 220 A.D.2d 762; People v. Carney, 179 A.D.2d 818; People v. Smith, 176 A.D.2d 904, 905). Accordingly, the conviction of assault in the third degree under the ninth count of the indictment is reversed.

The sentence is not excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Thorpe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1997
245 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Thorpe

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEMAR C. THORPE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 664