From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1984
105 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

November 13, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.).


Judgments affirmed.

We find no merit in the defendant's contention that provisions for mandatory enhanced prison sentences for second felony offenders established by article 70 of the Penal Law are unconstitutional (see People v Cates, 104 A.D.2d 895; People v Kepple, 98 A.D.2d 783; People v Bryant, 47 A.D.2d 51).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Weinstein, J.P., Brown, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1984
105 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THADDEUS LEROY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1984

Citations

105 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Velasquez

With regard to the defendant's contention that the second felony offender statute (see Penal Law, § 70.06) is…

People v. Smith

The tenant's room was independent of the rest of the house, and should be considered a separate "dwelling"…