Summary
holding it was not error to admit in-court identifications for the first time without notice to defendant since witnesses had not made pretrial identifications and counsel had the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses
Summary of this case from Castillo v. WalshOpinion
November 13, 1990
Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.).
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.