From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thompson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Aug 13, 1965
47 Misc. 2d 893 (N.Y. App. Term 1965)

Opinion

August 13, 1965

Appeal from the Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Queens, JOHN M. MURTAGH, J., J. WOLFE CHASSEN, J.

Anthony F. Marra and Phyllis Skloot for appellant.

Frank D. O'Connor, District Attorney ( Lester D. Janoff of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment of conviction of petit larceny should be affirmed. Judgment of conviction of vagrancy should be reversed on the law and facts and complaint dismissed. The People failed to establish defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Furthermore, we do not approve of the practice of assigning a different lawyer to represent the defendant at each of his appearances in court. The requirements of due process are not met if a defendant is deprived of his constitutional right to the effective aid of counsel in preparing his defense ( Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 71; Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45; Jones v. Cunningham, 313 F.2d 347, 353).

Concur — DI GIOVANNA, GULOTTA and BRENNER, JJ.

Judgment of conviction of petit larceny affirmed. Judgment of conviction of vagrancy reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Thompson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Aug 13, 1965
47 Misc. 2d 893 (N.Y. App. Term 1965)
Case details for

People v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OLIVER THOMPSON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Aug 13, 1965

Citations

47 Misc. 2d 893 (N.Y. App. Term 1965)
263 N.Y.S.2d 440

Citing Cases

Matter of Figueroa v. Figueroa

A respondent brought before the court for failure to obey an order of protection must be afforded a hearing…