From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thompson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 26, 2016
143 A.D.3d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

10-26-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jonathan THOMPSON, appellant.

Laurette Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Felice B. Milani of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Croce of counsel), for respondent.


Laurette Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Felice B. Milani of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Croce of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), rendered November 17, 2014, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 341, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256–257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Bernardini, 142 A.D.3d 671, 36 N.Y.S.3d 827 ). The defendant's valid appeal waiver precludes review of his challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution to the charge of murder in the second degree (see People v. Conway, 140 A.D.3d 1185, 33 N.Y.S.3d 761 ; People v. DuChatellier, 138 A.D.3d 887, 28 N.Y.S.3d 332 ; People v. Pinero, 138 A.D.3d 763, 27 N.Y.S.3d 883 ).

The defendant's remaining contention, that his plea should be vacated because the County Court allowed the prosecutor to conduct a portion of the plea allocution, is without merit (see People v. Johnson, 140 A.D.3d 1188, 35 N.Y.S.3d 375 ; People v. Fowler, 111 A.D.3d 958, 958, 975 N.Y.S.2d 691 ; cf. People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Thompson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 26, 2016
143 A.D.3d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jonathan THOMPSON, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 26, 2016

Citations

143 A.D.3d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
39 N.Y.S.3d 800
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7041

Citing Cases

People v. Thompson

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 2d Dept: 143 AD3d 1007 (Suffolk)…

People v. Smith

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and…