From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1981
53 N.Y.2d 983 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Argued May 6, 1981

Decided June 4, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, LAWRENCE J. TONETTI, J.

Erica Horwitz and William E. Hellerstein for appellant.

Mario Merola, District Attorney (Howard Birnbach and Timothy J. McGinn of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

On this record, we cannot say that the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to support defendant's conviction of the crime of robbery in the first degree. This being so, our inquiry is at an end for we have no power to assess the credibility of the witnesses or the weight of the evidence. Such questions must be left to the trier of fact. (See, e.g., People v De Tore, 34 N.Y.2d 199, 206-207; see, generally, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 198, p 742.)

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1981
53 N.Y.2d 983 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

People v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE THOMAS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 4, 1981

Citations

53 N.Y.2d 983 (N.Y. 1981)

Citing Cases

People v. Carr

We would affirm. Matters of credibility are for the trier of fact ( see, People v. Thomas, 53 N.Y.2d 983).…

People v. Brown

Nor is there merit to defendant's contention that — in a case where the testimony indicated two shots had…