People v. Thomas

2 Citing cases

  1. People v. Warren J. T.

    208 A.D.3d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

    The defendant has served his term of imprisonment; therefore, whether the term of imprisonment was excessive is academic. His term of five years of postrelease supervision, imposed upon his conviction of assault in the second degree as a class D violent felony offense, and based upon his status as a second felony offender, was legal and mandatory (see Penal Law §§ 70.45[2] ; 70.06[6]; People v. Thomas, 192 A.D.3d 831, 831, 139 N.Y.S.3d 870 ; People v. Dozier, 109 A.D.3d 838, 839, 971 N.Y.S.2d 128 ). The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are without merit.

  2. People v. Warren J. T.

    2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 4980 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

    The defendant has served his term of imprisonment; therefore, whether the term of imprisonment was excessive is academic. His term of five years of postrelease supervision, imposed upon his conviction of assault in the second degree as a class D violent felony offense, and based upon his status as a second felony offender, was legal and mandatory (see Penal Law §§ 70.45[2]; 70.06[6]; People v Thomas, 192 A.D.3d 831, 831; People v Dozier, 109 A.D.3d 838, 839). The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are without merit.