From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 25, 1996
88 N.Y.2d 821 (N.Y. 1996)

Opinion

Argued March 21, 1996

Decided April 25, 1996

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.

Ronna Gordon-Galchus, Bayside, for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney of Queens County, Kew Gardens (Cheryl Hone and Steven J. Chananie of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We affirm for the reasons stated by Presiding Justice Mangano at the Appellate Division ( 213 A.D.2d 73). We add that our decision in People v Smith ( 87 N.Y.2d 715) is not to the contrary. Smith stands for a different and more limited proposition involving waiver of inquiry with respect to pending criminal charges on an unrelated matter.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 25, 1996
88 N.Y.2d 821 (N.Y. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFF THOMAS, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 25, 1996

Citations

88 N.Y.2d 821 (N.Y. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 491
666 N.E.2d 1364

Citing Cases

People v. White

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed. The defendant's contention regarding the propriety of the…

People v. Rutledge

Defendant failed to raise an issue of fact at trial concerning the voluntariness of his statements ( see…