From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thasa

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 25, 1973
296 N.E.2d 804 (N.Y. 1973)

Opinion

Argued March 15, 1973

Decided April 25, 1973

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, PIERRE G. LUNDBERG, J.

George J. Aspland, District Attorney ( Selig Rosenzweig of counsel), for appellant.

Leonard D. Wexler and Richard T. Haefeli for respondent.



Order affirmed in the following memorandum: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed on the ground that there is ample support for the affirmed findings of fact that the defendant was incapable of understanding or waiving constitutional rights accorded him by Miranda (see Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436) and that the People failed to prove the voluntariness of the defendant's confession beyond a reasonable doubt (see, e.g., People v. Valerius, 31 N.Y.2d 51, 55). We pass on no other question.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, BREITEL, JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER.


Summaries of

People v. Thasa

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 25, 1973
296 N.E.2d 804 (N.Y. 1973)
Case details for

People v. Thasa

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. WILLIYAN THASA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 25, 1973

Citations

296 N.E.2d 804 (N.Y. 1973)
296 N.E.2d 804
344 N.Y.S.2d 2

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

Defendants move (a) to suppress various statements obtained from them at the time of their arrest, and (b) to…