Opinion
C086026
07-23-2018
In re T.H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. T.H., Defendant and Appellant.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Super. Ct. No. J37706)
This appeal comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) and In re Kevin S. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 97. Having reviewed the record as required by Wende and Kevin S., we affirm the judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
A juvenile wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) filed on October 23, 2015, alleged the then 17-year-old minor T.H. committed misdemeanor battery while on school property. (Pen Code, § 243.2, subd. (a).) The minor made two motions to dismiss the petition, which the trial court denied. After the probation department conducted an evaluation and submitted a written report, the trial court determined informal probation was appropriate for the minor and ordered restitution in the amount of $3,303.30. The minor accepted the court's order of informal probation and restitution.
II. DISCUSSION
We appointed counsel to represent the minor on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) The minor was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. Having reviewed the whole record, we find no arguable issue which could result in a more favorable outcome for the minor.
III. DISPOSITION
The order is affirmed.
/S/_________
RENNER, J. We concur: /S/_________
HULL, Acting P. J. /S/_________
HOCH, J.