From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re T.H.

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Sep 14, 2012
A134968 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 14, 2012)

Opinion

A134968

09-14-2012

In re T.H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. T.H., Defendant and Appellant.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 81579)

The 17-year-old minor appeals from a dispositional order continuing her on probation following her admission of a probation violation. Her attorney has asked this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) The minor was informed of her right to file a supplemental brief, which she has not done. Upon independent review of the record, we conclude no arguable issues are presented for review and affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural History

In September 2011, the minor was declared a ward and placed on probation in her mother's home following her admission to one count of misdemeanor grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (a)). The probation report indicates that the minor had been drinking alcohol at the time of the offense. The minor was required as a condition of probation to "not use, possess or be under the influence of any alcoholic beverages."

In December 2011, the minor was detained and a probation violation petition was filed after she tested positive for alcohol on a preliminary alcohol screening test. The probation report indicates that that the minor's grandmother called the minor's probation officer when the minor came home late from school smelling of alcohol. On January 26, 2012, the minor admitted the probation violation.

Although the probation department recommended the minor be placed in a camp program, the court rejected that recommendation, finding that her record thus far was "de minimus . . . such that it is in the court's view not deserving of the girls camp." Accordingly, the court continued her on in-home probation and required her to attend an out-patient treatment program.

The minor filed a timely notice of appeal.

Discussion

The minor was represented by retained counsel in the probation violation proceedings. No error appears in the acceptance of her admissions of the probation violation and we find no abuse of discretion with regard to the probation conditions imposed by the court.

Disposition

The dispositional order is affirmed.

_______________

Pollak, Acting P.J.
We concur: _______________
Siggins, J.
_______________
Jenkins, J.


Summaries of

In re T.H.

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Sep 14, 2012
A134968 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 14, 2012)
Case details for

In re T.H.

Case Details

Full title:In re T.H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

Date published: Sep 14, 2012

Citations

A134968 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 14, 2012)