Opinion
2d Crim. No. B240938
11-19-2012
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RYAN MICHAEL TEPEZANO, Defendant and Appellant.
Richard B. Lennon, , under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
(Super. Ct. No. 2011033752)
(Ventura County)
Ryan Michael Tepezano appeals an order of probation granted after he expressly waived his trial rights and constitutional rights and pleaded guilty to two counts of grand theft. (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (a).) The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Tepezano on formal probation for 36 months. Terms and conditions of probation included 180 days of confinement in county jail, payment of various fines and fees, and payment of victim restitution. The court awarded Tepezano two days of presentence custody credit.
We appointed counsel to represent Tepezano in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief raising no issues.
On August 28, 2012, we advised Tepezano by mail that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a response.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Tepezano's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
GILBERT, P.J. We concur:
YEGAN, J.
PERREN, J.
Nancy Ayers, Judge
Superior Court County of Ventura
Richard B. Lennon, , under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.