From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 11, 2010
70 A.D.3d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 102003.

February 11, 2010.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), rendered June 20, 2008 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree.

William T. Morrison, Albany, for appellant.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Christopher D. Horn of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Rose, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur.


Defendant was charged in an indictment with three counts of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and three counts of petit larceny in connection with his possession and negotiation of three forged checks in the amounts of $311.91, $491.83 and $491.62. He pleaded guilty to one count of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree in full satisfaction of the entire indictment and executed a written waiver of his right to appeal. Thereafter, in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement, Supreme Court sentenced defendant as a second felony offender to a prison term of 3 to 6 years and ordered restitution in the amount of $1,295.36.

Defendant's lone assertion here — that Supreme Court erred in imposing $1,295.36 in restitution without first conducting a hearing — is precluded by his valid waiver of appeal inasmuch as that amount was an explicit part of defendant's agreed-upon plea bargain ( see People v Gilmour, 61 AD3d 1122, 1123-1124, lv denied 12 NY3d 925; cf. People v McLean, 59 AD3d 859, 860-861). In any event, contrary to defendant's contention, the court properly imposed restitution in the amount of all three forged checks given that defendant's guilty plea was in full satisfaction of the six-count indictment ( see Penal Law § 60.27 [a]; People v Casiano, 8 AD3d 761, 762).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 11, 2010
70 A.D.3d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BARRY TAYLOR, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 11, 2010

Citations

70 A.D.3d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 1021
894 N.Y.S.2d 572

Citing Cases

People v. Woods

Accordingly, we conclude that defendant's waiver of appeal was knowing, voluntary and intelligent (see People…

People v. Woods

Defendant's argument that the sentence was harsh and excessive is therefore precluded by his valid waiver of…