From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Taylor

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Aug 20, 2020
68 Misc. 3d 129 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)

Opinion

2019-851 W CR

08-20-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Daphne J. TAYLOR, Appellant.

John P. Savoca, for appellant. Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).


John P. Savoca, for appellant.

Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).

PRESENT: THOMAS A. ADAMS, P.J., JERRY GARGUILO, ELIZABETH H. EMERSON, JJ

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California (386 US 738 [1967] ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id. ; People v. Murray , 169 AD3d 227 [2019] ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v. Paige , 54 AD2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v. Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 [1979] ).

ADAMS, P.J., GARGUILO and EMERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Taylor

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Aug 20, 2020
68 Misc. 3d 129 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
Case details for

People v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Daphne J. Taylor…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Aug 20, 2020

Citations

68 Misc. 3d 129 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 50949
130 N.Y.S.3d 182