From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Taylor

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

09-28-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jeffrey A. TAYLOR, Appellant.

Mitch Kessler, Cohoes, for appellant. Stephen K. Cornwell Jr., District Attorney, Binghamton (Stephen D. Ferri of counsel), for respondent.


Mitch Kessler, Cohoes, for appellant.

Stephen K. Cornwell Jr., District Attorney, Binghamton (Stephen D. Ferri of counsel), for respondent.

Before: McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR., LYNCH, DEVINE and PRITZKER, JJ.

PRITZKER, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered November 2, 2015, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal contempt in the first degree.

In satisfaction of a superior court information and another pending charge, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal contempt in the first degree. At sentencing, defendant made a pro se motion to withdraw his plea, asserting that the plea was involuntary inasmuch as, among other things, he was coerced by and received ineffective assistance of counsel. After making certain inquiries, County Court refused to accept the handwritten motion because it was submitted pro se and not by defense counsel; however, the court also noted that, if it were to consider the motion, it would be denied. The court then sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of 1 ½ to 3 years. Defendant appeals.

We are unpersuaded by defendant's contention that County Court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his plea. County Court expressly and correctly noted that, if considered, the motion would be denied as the record reflected that defendant denied that he had been threatened or coerced by anyone into accepting the plea. Furthermore, there is no indication in the record that the plea was the result of "innocence, fraud or mistake in the inducement" ( People v. Taylor, 135 A.D.3d 1237, 1237, 23 N.Y.S.3d 590 [2016] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted], lv. denied 27 N.Y.3d 1075, 38 N.Y.S.3d 846, 60 N.E.3d 1212 [2016] ; see People v. Waters, 80 A.D.3d 1002, 1003, 914 N.Y.S.2d 781 [2011], lv. denied 16 N.Y.3d 864, 923 N.Y.S.2d 426, 947 N.E.2d 1205 [2011] ; People v. Singletray, 51 A.D.3d 1334, 1334–1335, 858 N.Y.S.2d 483 [2008], lv. denied 11 N.Y.3d 741, 864 N.Y.S.2d 400, 894 N.E.2d 664 [2008] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR., LYNCH and DEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Taylor

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jeffrey A. TAYLOR…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 28, 2017

Citations

153 A.D.3d 1524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
153 A.D.3d 1524

Citing Cases

People v. Taylor

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 3d Dept: 153 AD3d 1524 (Broome)…